Search for: "Department of Transportation v. King" Results 1 - 20 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2017, 10:20 am by Steven M. Taber
Yesterday, May 30, 2017, the Department of Homeland Security issued a statement ( after a conference call with European Home Affairs Commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos and Transport Commissioner Violeta Bulc to discuss aviation security. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am by Candace Cathey
handle=hein.journals/usflr29&collection=journals&id=661 "Martin Luther King, Walker v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:06 am
Their complaints against the King of Great Britain, listed in the Declaration of Independence, included his transportation of colonists "beyond Seas to be tried. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:18 am by Amy Howe
Mortgage Bankers Association, holding that amendments to interpretative rules do not require notice-and-comment rulemaking, and Department of Transportation v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:30 am by Christopher Walker
One decision, however, also grapples with the fringe: Department of Transportation v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 2:08 am
Pitt Subscription Required KINGS COUNTY Criminal Practice Defendant's Handwriting Exemplar Non-Testimonial, Lays Outside Scope of Fifth Amendment People v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:29 am by Earl Drott
(Instead, the county averred that the property was controlled by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), a separate governmental entity, at the time in question.) [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by Amy Howe
Wednesday’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for Ramos v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Lord Toulson then turned to a second line of argument, first developed by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in King v American Airlines. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  As the Court has shown us time and again in its immunity jurisprudence, the government can do no wrong, because the government -- like the King -- is sovereign. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:06 am by MBettman
Key Statute and Precedent R.C. 153.19 (requires a liquidated damages clause in contracts to construct public improvements funded with state money; the daily per diem for determining damages when contracted work is not completed by a mutually agreed upon deadline or extension is determined from a rate schedule established by the Ohio Department of Transportation) Sheffield-King Milling Co. v. [read post]