Search for: "Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen" Results 1 - 20 of 306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm
She used the State's public transportation system, provided by the Department of Transportation, for commuting to work. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
An important decision by the Supreme Court of Virginia, Elizabeth River Crossings v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:16 am by Joy Waltemath
Because a New York police officer’s complaints about the department’s arrest quota policy did not fall within his official duties and he elected a channel with a civilian analogue (that ordinary citizens use) to pursue his complaint, he spoke as a citizen and his speech was protected by the First Amendment, determined the Second Circuit, vacating the grant of summary judgment on his retaliation claim (Matthews v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
Secret Service; the Transportation Security Administration (TSA); the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 3:00 am by Jon Gelman
Court of Appeals for the District Columbia Circuit in Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:56 am by David Urban
  In the midst of the congratulatory posts from the public, two citizens post comments sharply criticizing the Department. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 2:02 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Board of Directors of the Truckee-Carson Irrigation District (Tribal Water Rights)Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 2:02 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Board of Directors of the Truckee-Carson Irrigation District (Tribal Water Rights)Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"The policy of deterring illegal drug use by EMS workers is just as crucial as the policy of preventing police officers from using prohibited drugs and the Department “has a substantial and compelling interest in ensuring that workers responsible for the well-being and transportation of injured and sick citizens are free from the effects of illegal drugs. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 3:06 pm by Curt Cutting
In September the Ninth Circuit asked the Supreme Court to decide this question of wage-and-hour law: “Is operating engineers’ offsite ‘mobilization work’—including the transportation to and from a public works site of roadwork grinding equipment—performed ‘in the execution of [a] contract for public work,’ Cal. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The third cause of action alleged that the issuance of the incidental take permits was an abrogation of the department’s affirmative duty to protect public trust resources. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
’ Public Citizen Health Research Group v. [read post]