Search for: "Derek Muller"
Results 321 - 340
of 371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
Commentary on the argument comes from Ilya Shapiro at the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and Derek Muller at Excess of Democracy. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
Commentary comes from Derek Muller at Excess of Democracy, who recaps the oral argument and concludes that the “case went in so many directions, it’s hard to identify how the Court might proceed. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Commentary comes from Noah Feldman of Bloomberg View, Derek Muller at Excess of Democracy, Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog, and Michael Morley in a podcast for the Northwestern University Law Review Online. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
Prominent election law scholar Derek Muller, who was part of a cross-ideological group of experts who endorsed and helped develop the Senate version, offers some potential reservations about one provision of the House bill, which creates a new legal cause of action challenging state officials' refusals to "tabulate" the vote of any person "who is entitled to vote under Federal law or is otherwise qualified to vote. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:56 am
As Pepperdine lawprof Derek Muller responded on the twitters, there is a claim buried in there that’s simply false, that there is no evidence that higher bar scores correlate to protecting the public from bad lawyers. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:15 am
At Excess of Democracy, Pepperdine law professor Derek Muller offers a less sympathetic take on the Sixth Circuit’s decision: prior to 2005, Ohio had zero days of early in-person voting; until 2014, it was 35 days; and the legislature amended that to 28 days. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:22 pm
I am less familiar with Muller's views. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:20 pm
You can watch the event that I moderated, from UCLA Law’s Safeguarding Democracy Project, here: [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 1:09 pm
(Our analysis builds on the excellent work in the last few days by (among others) Matthew Seligman (see here, here, here, and here); Protect Democracy; Andy Craig; Derek Muller; Ned Foley, Michael McConnell, Derek Muller, Brad Smith, and Rick Pildes; and Henry Olsen. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:51 am
Circosta (Mar. 4, 2022) Emergency Motion for Stay of Injunction Pending Appeal (Mar. 9, 2022) Order Granting Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Mar. 10, 2022) Backgrounder: Jonathan Weisman, Judge Blocks Effort to Disqualify Cawthorn from Ballot as ‘Insurrectionist’, New York Times (Mar. 4, 2022) Constitutional Accountability Center Amicus Brief (Mar. 11, 2022) Plaintiff’s Response to Motion to Stay (Mar. 14, 2022) North Carolina GOP Amicus Brief… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
(Derek Muller hinted at a similar disposition last week.)Such a holding would have other virtues, as well: For example, it would not preclude the states from excluding candidates from the ballot when they clearly can’t serve (e.g., if they are 27 or were born in Guyana or have already been elected twice), because the state's justifications for doing so are far stronger. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 10:16 am
Louis University Lisa McElroy ProfLisaMcElroy Drexel Tracy McGaugh millennialprof Touro William McGeveran BillMcGev Minnesota Paul McGreal PaulMcGreal Dayton Greg McNeal gregorymcneal Pepperdine Nancy Millar lpprof Phoenix James Milles jgmilles SUNY Buffalo Derek Muller derektmuller Pepperdine Haskell Murray HaskellMurray Regent Cynthia Nance Nancecy Arkansas Ira Steven Nathenson nathenson St. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm
Louis University Lisa McElroy ProfLisaMcElroy Drexel Tracy McGaugh millennialprof Touro William McGeveran BillMcGev Minnesota Paul McGreal PaulMcGreal Dayton Greg McNeal gregorymcneal Pepperdine Nancy Millar lpprof Phoenix James Milles jgmilles SUNY Buffalo Richard Moberly Richard_Moberly Nebraska Derek Muller derektmuller Pepperdine Haskell Murray HaskellMurray Regent Cynthia Nance Nancecy Arkansas Ira Steven Nathenson nathenson St. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:14 am
Derek Muller for the pointer. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Commentary comes from Nathaniel Persily at the Stanford Lawyer, Rick Hasen at Slate (who also notes an error in Justice Ginsburg’s opinion for the Court at his Election Law Blog), Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Seth Davis at PrawfsBlawg, and Derek Muller at Excess of Democracy. [read post]
14 May 2020, 12:13 am
(See Derek Muller's post). [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:04 am
At Excess of Democracy, Derek Muller offers “highlights from oral argument,” noting that “[i]t’s hard to overstate how many times the justices asked either side about limiting principles—do electors have unfettered discretion? [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:53 am
It was the “objective evidence” of the recording of the stop that enabled the court to find the officer’s contrary testimony to be literally unbelievable.Thanks to Derek Muller for the link. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:11 pm
As for the underlying legal question in the Supreme Court case—the "Purcell Principle"—Derek Muller offers some thoughts at Excess of Democracy. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Even more importantly, as Derek Muller points out, the Evenwel plaintiffs are mounting a direct attack on federalism: “The Court has, for once, largely left this matter to the political process to decide. [read post]
