Search for: "Desist v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2010, 5:18 pm
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 2:36 pm
(United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, March 2, 2020, Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:04 pm
After patent issuance, the patentee has enforceable rights in that he/she can sue another entity for damages and/or an injunction to stop that entity from making, using, selling, offering for sale or importing the patented invention into the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:15 am
” Rather, the “notice of the dispute arose years later when Respondent attempted to register the disputed domain names as trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 12:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:46 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 1:38 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 10:07 am
Finally, K-V states that it faces the balance of hardships. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 12:16 pm
(Opinion, United States Supreme Court)Massachusetts Superior Court Denies Secretary of State Galvin's Motion Against RobinhoodRobinhood Financial, LLC. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:37 pm
In June of 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a notice of allowance for Radio Systems’ SmartDoor device. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 7:43 am
United States last summer would provide clear guidelines on which types of online data access were permissible and which were not. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:19 am
In Matthew Collins v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:38 pm
g=65dd0e09-9f2b-4559-904d-ddb84df6b986 Already, LLC dba Yums v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
NLRB, challenges an NLRB cease and desist order relating to a purported refusal to bargain, and is currently pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
The Court also concluded that a state "cease and desist" letter likewise did not justify the enhancement because it did not offer the defendant the chance to participate in the process in any meaningful way. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:15 am
Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 4:20 pm
College Hill Properties v City of Worcester, 2015 WL 5737147 (D. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 11:20 am
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. has petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for certiorari following an unfavorable ruling from the Ninth Circuit in the matter of VIP Products LLC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Specifically K-V wants a ban on the importation of all 17 HPC “except as authorized by [K-V]” and to prevent the sale or solicitation of 17 HPC within the United States from any imported source unless authorized by K-V. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:07 am
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
