Search for: "Desist v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2010, 9:04 pm by James Yang
After patent issuance, the patentee has enforceable rights in that he/she can sue another entity for damages and/or an injunction to stop that entity from making, using, selling, offering for sale or importing the patented invention into the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:15 am by gmlevine
” Rather, the “notice of the dispute arose years later when Respondent attempted to register the disputed domain names as trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 12:16 pm
(Opinion, United States Supreme Court)Massachusetts Superior Court Denies Secretary of State Galvin's Motion Against RobinhoodRobinhood Financial, LLC. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:37 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
In June of 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a notice of allowance for Radio Systems’ SmartDoor device. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 7:43 am by Eric Goldman
United States last summer would provide clear guidelines on which types of online data access were permissible and which were not. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm by Keith R. Fisher
NLRB, challenges an NLRB cease and desist order relating to a purported refusal to bargain, and is currently pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
The Court also concluded that a state "cease and desist" letter likewise did not justify the enhancement because it did not offer the defendant the chance to participate in the process in any meaningful way. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 11:20 am by Josh H. Escovedo
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. has petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for certiorari following an unfavorable ruling from the Ninth Circuit in the matter of VIP Products LLC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Lisa Salazar
Specifically K-V wants a ban on the importation of all 17 HPC “except as authorized by [K-V]” and to prevent the sale or solicitation of 17 HPC within the United States from any imported source unless authorized by K-V. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:07 am by Blair Albom
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]