Search for: "Desist v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm
United States, 141 S. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:32 am
In first instance, the United Stated District Court of Arizona decided on the case. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 11:13 am
Press v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:30 am
The Respondent in Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. ll, FA1007001336979 (Nat. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 1:16 pm
Sitz, the United States Supreme Court found only 1.6% of the drivers stopped in the checkpoints were charged with DUI. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 1:23 am
The three United States patents at issue, which cover syringes having needle shield safety devices and may be used with pre-filled pharmaceutical injection syringes, are owned by Saftey Syringes, Inc. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 6:58 pm
In Giger v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:14 pm
On June 4, 2018, the Supreme Court of United States of America decided that the freedom to express religious beliefs would trump the right to equality. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 2:24 pm
In the United States, Porsche does have a registration for "Cayman" in trademark international class 025 for numerous clothing items and it specifically includes FOOTWEAR. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 2:35 pm
The United States International Trade Commission (USITC, ITC) just gave notice of its decision to extend the target date for the investigation of Apple's complaint against Samsung by two weeks to March 23, 2013. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
But that doesn't mean this outlier will have been the last case in which a United States district court with a FRAND contract (and rate-setting) case before it precludes a patent holder from enforcing potential or actual ITC remedies. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:28 am
Defense Distributed's efforts were initially met with opposition from the United States Department of State. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:21 am
State Board, 135 S.Ct. at 1109; see United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 2:43 pm
United States shows that the federal computer crime law does not criminalize the common and useful practice of scraping publicly available information on the internet. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 7:56 pm
” A NYT article explains that: People who buy a new watch in the United States will still see Apple’s Blood Oxygen app on the devices, the company said. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 4:42 pm
United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 799 F.2d 1572, 1578 (Fed. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:40 pm
See, e.g., Allied Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
Research & resources In an unpublished paper entitled “Quacks like a Duck: a New Test for News-Media Libel in the United States”, Carrie Leonetti of the University of Oregon School of Law argues that the actual-malice standard promotes sloppy reporting. [read post]
