Search for: "Dexter v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2007, 9:10 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Dexter L. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:01 pm
In fact, the argument is really over when she states that “Harvard” is a place of public accommodation, rejecting the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Cullen v Netflix as “not the law in the First Circuit. [read post]
In a dispute over the meaning of a procedural rule, justices seem settled: “Mistake” means “mistake”
20 Apr 2022, 6:51 am
ShareKemp v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:03 am
Newsom v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 10:34 am
United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Hassan v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:42 am
Further evidence for this is provided by Dexter v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:57 pm
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 9:49 am
The claimant had evidence from a surveyor valuer, stated to be based on (unspecified) ‘market evidence’. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
”The procedural issue presented in Dupree v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 8:54 am
Affirming summary judgment against his state-law age discrimination claim, the court observed that the company hired the employee despite these shortcomings in hopes that he would correct them, but he did not (Nash v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 8:13 am
This is a hard research problem—a recent survey of existing E2E-V systems shows that quite a few unsolved challenges remain in remote E2E-V systems. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 8:34 am
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 12:41 pm
V, §16. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 5:48 am
Additional Resources: Broward settles case of teen run over by bus, Jan. 24, 2017, By Brittany Wallman, Sun-Sentinel More Blog Entries: Baugh v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:24 am
State of California - Dept. of Transp. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:32 pm
State, 2010 OK CR 14 (OklaCrim App 7/1/2010) State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
It is a very interesting case not only on section 188(1) accommodation but also on mandatory orders after Imam v LB Croydon (our note). [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:03 pm
For further information, contact Timothy Creagan at (202) 272-0016 (v), (202) 272-0074 (TTY), or visit the Access Board’s website. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:48 am
We should add some context before we move on.The Court of Customs and Patent Appeals faced a similar question in United States v. [read post]
