Search for: "Diamond v State" Results 1 - 20 of 1,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2011, 2:03 pm by Dwight Sullivan
As expected, today’s SCOTUS order list included the denial of cert in Diamond v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:15 am by scanner1
LOWE, an individual, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The PATA states that New York law governs the interpretation of its terms, J.A. 219, and under that law we review the District Court’s interpretation of the PATA de novo, Dreisinger v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
By allowing indirect purchasers who had no standing to sue under their state's antitrust laws to be part of the settlement class, the appellate majority has created a “come one, come all” environment that “sets the class action ship in [the Ninth] Circuit badly adrift,” the dissent argued.The decision is Sullivan v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:52 am by Jon Tracy
NIMJ filed an amicus brief in the cert petition at the Supreme Court this week in the case Diamond v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 11:45 pm by Nicholas Kaster
Diamond Hong, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2018-1688, 27 August 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:50 am by sally
Rossetti Marketing Ltd v Diamond Sofa Co Ltd [2011] EWHC 2482 (QB); [2011] WLR (D) 287 “Whether a party was a commercial agent within the meaning of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the member states relating to self-employed commercial agents or the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 was to be determined by reference to the terms and context of the agreement at the date it was concluded. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm by Eugene R. Fidell
The Supreme Court today denied certiorari in Diamond v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 3:22 pm by Aimee Czachorowski
Any newcomer to Delaware would note the proliferation of business names containing some variation on “Diamond State” or “Blue Rock” – and, as the Court of Chancery recently noted in its letter opinion in Diamond State Tire, Inc. v. [read post]