Search for: "Diaz v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2014, 1:15 pm
United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007), with the United States Sentencing Commission’s Guideline ranges for drug trafficking violations, as did the Honorable John Gleeson, District Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As the Court of Appeals has explained, where a police officer has probable cause to believe that the driver of an automobile has committed a traffic violation, a stop does not violate the state or federal constitutions and neither the primary motivation of the officer nor a determination of what a reasonable traffic officer would have done under the circumstances is relevant akin to People v Robinson and Whren v United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm by Stephen Bilkis
According to defendant, the admission of those records in evidence violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution under Crawford v Washington. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:07 pm
Diaz was released from jail, he was immediately picked up by “ICE”, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement unit, to remove him from the United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
After Diaz filed the lawsuit, the University filed a petition to cancel the Diaz trademark with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:38 am by Sheppard Mullin
Smith and Ryan Duffy Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit raised the stakes on what has become one of the most prominent topics in the labor law community in recent times with its 2-1 decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm by Marty Lederman
’” Then, relying upon the Supreme Court’s brand-new decision in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:48 am by Kevin Russell
Second, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure now require a sentencing court, before accepting a guilty plea, to ensure that the defendant understands “that, if convicted, a defendant who is not a United States citizen may be removed from the United States, denied citizenship, and denied admission to the United States in the future. [read post]