Search for: "Diaz v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2010, 9:26 am by Ann Althouse
"No other circuit allows entry into the home on less than reasonable suspicion," writes 9th Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by ernst
Diaz, governmental functions in Ambach v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
Toomey argued that the district court had misunderstood several important technical aspects of Upstream surveillance and, as a result, had underestimated the scope and scale of the United States government’s searches of private internet communications. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
Justice White explained how all this works with a special focus on the role of defense counsel in a concurring and dissenting opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of Jennings v Rodriquez After a 2004 conviction, Alejandro Rodriguez, a Mexican citizen and a lawful permanent resident of the United States, was detained pursuant to §1226 while the Government sought to remove him. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:03 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Flández-Marcel, 2019 WL 6836785 (First Circuit, 2019) the district court denied Alejandro Díaz-Alarcón petition for return of his daughter from the United States to Chile. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 8:29 am by William D. Kickham
Previously, on July 1 of this year, I blogged about a case that was handed down by the United States Supreme Court earlier this year. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 8:29 am
Previously, on July 1 of this year, I blogged about a case that was handed down by the United States Supreme Court earlier this year. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Weekly S486 (Fla., July 12, 2007) ....................................................................16 Diaz v. [read post]