Search for: "Dick v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2013, 6:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
A subsequent decision by the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 4:38 am by SHG
Why then did Judge Bundy ignore clear caselaw from the Supreme Court of the United States to rule that Dick’s sign violated the local obscenity ordinance? [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:04 pm by Marie S. Newman
Duke Law School does not go out of its way to publicize the fact that the only United States President ever to resign, Richard M. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:30 pm
In re-reading the DC Circuit's famous recent Second Amendment decision in Parker v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
Stanford student Anthony Dick summarizes Monday’s argument in Horne v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:28 am
A later decision in 1996 (Smiley v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
Fyk received his requested relief against the United States, what would change? [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:21 am by Steven Cohen
Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc et al – United States District Court – District of South Carolina – October 18th, 2019) involves a products liability case involved a CORE Bioflex athletic cup, manufactured by the defendant Shock Doctor and sold by the defendant Dick’s Sporting Goods. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 2:48 am
Federal officers or agencies sued or prosecuted (a) A civil action or criminal prosecution commenced in a State court against any of the following may be removed by them to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending: (1) The United States or any agency thereof or any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States or of any agency thereof, sued… [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
Judge Milan Smith has a fairly good quote in this regard that's both accurate and worth repeating: "Even at a time when the largest law firms in the United States were composed of not many more than one hundred lawyers, Judge Friendly observed that we live in an 'age of increased specialization and high mobility of the bar.' Spanos v. [read post]