Search for: "Direct Sales Co. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
In Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 2:36 pm
(United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, March 2, 2020, Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 11:24 am
” Id. at444 (quoting DeepsouthPacking Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:17 pm
Atlanta Attachment Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 2:45 am
An even earlier case, United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:45 pm
United Shoe Machinery Co and Illinois Brick Co v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 8:59 am
New York courts have interpreted § 684(3)(c) to mean in essence that the sale of the first franchise unit is exempt from registration if the unit was only offered to a maximum of two people (See BMW Co., Inc. et al. v Workbench Inc. et al. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:50 pm
AWR seeks to enjoin a timber salvage sale proposed by the United States Forest Service. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
United States Forest Service, 535 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc), and the U.S. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:00 am
Swagelok Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:16 am
Tiffany & Co. v. eBay Inc., No. 08- 3947 (2d Cir. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:28 am
Dilworth Co., 322 U.S. 349 (1944) (rejecting the application of sales tax to an out-of-state sale); General Trading Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
By the Kean Miller State and Local Tax Team On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 5:57 am
However, the distinction between direct taxes and indirect taxes acquired a new meaning in the United States with the development of the Constitution. [read post]
11 May 2018, 5:57 am
However, the distinction between direct taxes and indirect taxes acquired a new meaning in the United States with the development of the Constitution. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:22 am
[6/9/09 PM Update: The United States Supreme Court just cleared the Chrysler sale! [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:10 am
Such a resolution would, under the AECA, prohibit the president from moving forward with the sale unless he certified to Congress that “an emergency exist[ed] which require[d] such sale in the national security interests of the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
” (Bristol- Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]