Search for: "Direct Sales Co. v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm by admin
However, USPAP notes, “Use of direct excerpts from then-current appraisal reports prepared at the time of the retrospective effective date helps the appraiser and the reader understand market conditions as of the retrospective effective date. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:00 am by Jay Levine
Not surprisingly, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and plaintiffs’ bar have been pushing for an expansive reading of the law so that more such sales would be governed by American antitrust law. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
In 1913, California was one of the first States to prohibit the sale and possession of marijuana, and at the end of the century, California became the first State to authorize limited use of the drug for medicinal purposes. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court noted that, under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, 'the initial authorised sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item' (Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc.): the rationale behind this rule is that, once a patentee has received his reward through the sale of the patented item, he has no further right to restrain the use or enjoyment of it (United States v Univis Lens Co.). [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:15 pm by Eric Caligiuri
As an early defense in the case, Apple asserted that the consumer plaintiffs could not sue Apple because they supposedly were not “direct purchasers” from Apple under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:22 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Racketeering Charges for Off-Reservation Sale Of Cigarettes Lacking Tax Stamp Survive Dismissal United States v. [read post]