Search for: "Direct Sales Co. v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm
” Because we agree with the district court that the two agreements concern different subject matter and therefore do not merge, we affirm.The 2006 Covenant states: Molon hereby forever covenants not to sue Merkle- Korff for patent infringement (whether direct, contributory, or by inducement thereof) under either the ’915 patent or the ’726 patent with respect to any and all products previously or presently made, used or sold by Merkle-Korff in the United… [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
Walgreen Co., 18-349Issues: (1) Whether an accommodation that merely lessens or has the potential to eliminate the conflict between work and religious practice is “reasonable” per se, as the U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:33 pm by Richard Hunt
The court declined to retain jurisdiction of state law claims and dismissed the case, though without prejudice to a state court filing of the state law claims. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:19 pm by Amy Howe
’” The justices asked the U.S. solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in HSBC Holdings v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:00 am by Michelle Ghetti
This would be devastating to gun-related commerce throughout the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
He was under the care of psychologists and psychiatrists and being prescribed medication, but he was refusing to take most of his medicines as directed. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:44 pm by Nathan Smith
” Yet the “[p]rior sales and uses were not reported to the United States Patent Office. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am by CMS
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act  §§ 301-306). [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:35 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in  Perdue v. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 9:52 am by Emily I. Bridges
For over 40 years, Amzi Takiedine had been a 7-Eleven franchisee when he sued his franchisor in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]