Search for: "Direct Sales Co. v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 737
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2014, 9:00 pm
Aug. 13, 2010) The present posture of the case is that Ultramercial is again appealing from the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
Apple moved to dismiss, arguing that the iPhone owners could not sue be­cause they were not direct purchasers from Apple under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:32 pm
The plaintiff alleged that its competitor was not charging state sales tax on cash purchases, thereby obtaining a competitive advantage that injured the plaintiff’s business. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
There was no allegation that the allegedly false statement affected sales anywhere in the United States or its territories, or that CIMCO suffered injury in the United States market. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:10 am
Oct. 15, 2010), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida recently concluded that Office Depot, Inc. [read post]
R.S. 30:10(A)(3) provides an additional provision related to UMOs that states: If there is included in any unit created by the commissioner of conservation one or more unleased interests for which the party or parties entitled to market production therefrom have not made arrangements to separately dispose of the share of such production attributable to such tract, and the unit operator proceeds with the sale of unit production, then the unit… [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act  §§ 301-306). [read post]