Search for: "Direct Sales Co. v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act  §§ 301-306). [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:24 am by Cormac Early
United States, a challenge to the ban on direct corporate campaign spending in the Federal Campaign Finance Act. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm
  Perrigo Company and Perrigo Israel (collectively, "Perrigo") are pharmaceutical companies that develop, manufacture, market and distribute generic pharmaceutical products for sale throughout the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
The Board is directed to decide the case on the record before it, and that duty may not be delegated to another body.Conclusion: Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found that VAGISAN is not likely to cause confusion with opposer's mark VAGISIL.Bona Fide Intent to Use: Applicant had not advertised or sold its products in the United States, nor did it have a written marketing plan for the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Chiuminatta is cited:Thus, theevidence demonstrates no direct connection betweenSamsung’s worldwide sales of mobile phones and sales ofFairchild’s infringing power circuits. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:21 am by Samantha G. Wilson
While the cameras were then sold in the United States, and Nikon Corporation and another co-defendant “maintain websites in English targeting the United States” and Delaware, Sendai itself conducted no business in the United States. [read post]