Search for: "Direct Sales Co. v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act §§ 301-306). [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
JMS Co., 471 F.3d 1293, 1305–06 (Fed. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:44 am
In one of the more publicized cases, Merck & Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 9:15 am
In American Family Life Assurance Co. of Columbus v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm
Perrigo Company and Perrigo Israel (collectively, "Perrigo") are pharmaceutical companies that develop, manufacture, market and distribute generic pharmaceutical products for sale throughout the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
The Board is directed to decide the case on the record before it, and that duty may not be delegated to another body.Conclusion: Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found that VAGISAN is not likely to cause confusion with opposer's mark VAGISIL.Bona Fide Intent to Use: Applicant had not advertised or sold its products in the United States, nor did it have a written marketing plan for the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
After rejecting Pirate's contention that the "actual malice" standard from New York Times Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:21 am
While the cameras were then sold in the United States, and Nikon Corporation and another co-defendant “maintain websites in English targeting the United States” and Delaware, Sendai itself conducted no business in the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
Co., Inc., 102 F.3d 223, 226 (6th Cir. 1996) (citing Nogueroas v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am
Chiuminatta is cited:Thus, theevidence demonstrates no direct connection betweenSamsung’s worldwide sales of mobile phones and sales ofFairchild’s infringing power circuits. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
Further, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has entered a protective order governing the production of confidential information. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:26 pm
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court [See WIMS 3/21/13]. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 2:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:05 am
The proverbial battle of David versus Goliath is currently unfolding in United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 10:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
Absent a specific request for coverage not already in a client's policy, or the existence of a special relationship with the client, an insurance agent or broker has no continuing duty to advise, guide or direct a client to obtain additional coverage (see Murphy v Kuhn, supra; JKT Construction v United States Liab. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
Co., 496 U.S. 723, 78 (1990). [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
Co., 496 U.S. 723, 78 (1990). [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm
” Because we agree with the district court that the two agreements concern different subject matter and therefore do not merge, we affirm.The 2006 Covenant states: Molon hereby forever covenants not to sue Merkle- Korff for patent infringement (whether direct, contributory, or by inducement thereof) under either the ’915 patent or the ’726 patent with respect to any and all products previously or presently made, used or sold by Merkle-Korff in the United… [read post]
