Search for: "Dirks v. SEC" Results 1 - 20 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2011, 11:36 am by Steve Bainbridge
Here, for example, is the certificate for a subordinated debenture issued by Equity Funding of America, the company that starred in Dirks v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:29 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Actually, the SEC has pretty consistently taken the position that a tiper who gets sexual benefits from the tippee has gotten the requisite personal benefits to satisfy the Dirks test: See, e.g., SEC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:21 am by John Jascob
The SEC argued that this was a misapplication of the Supreme Court’s 1983 holding in SEC v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Insider trading for fiduciaries (directors of companies qualify) must meet the standard set out by the Supreme Court in SEC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Recognizing the size of this loophole, the Supreme Court filled some of it three years later in Dirks v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 10:21 am by John Jascob
Holley settled with the SEC in the New Jersey District Court on December 8, 2014, two days before the Second Circuit decided U.S. v. [read post]