Search for: "District of Columbia v. Barnes" Results 41 - 60 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Lyle Denniston reports that in a brief filed in federal district court in the District of Columbia on Monday, the “U.S. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:37 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit – on remand from the Supreme Court – struck down Amtrak’s “power to help write rules on the use of railroad tracks across the country. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:02 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia  Circuit sees quite a few cases raising these sorts of questions, it’s not all that often they reach the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm by John Ehrett
Barnes 14-395Issue: Whether the Fourth Circuit contravened 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
The district court denied the officials qualified immunity and the Third Circuit affirmed. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
Barnes, 14-395, is a state-on-top habeas case involving jurors in separate criminal cases who received religious advice on the death penalty from third parties. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am by Maureen Johnston
Barnes 14-395Issue: Whether the Fourth Circuit contravened 28 U.S.C. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
” Perhaps unsurprisingly, Barnes was found guilty of, among other things, two counts of first-degree murder. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am by Maureen Johnston
Barnes 14-395 Issue: Whether the Fourth Circuit contravened 28 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am by Amy Howe
  It heard oral arguments for the second time in Johnson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 12:13 am by Florian Mueller
The ITC said Microsoft should instead request an ITC enforcement proceeding.The last item on that docket of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is a procedural order (allowing some filings) of March 31, 2014. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Plaintiffs sued in the district court for the District of Columbia, alleging breach of contract, libel, and tortious interference. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:41 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Those include California (post-Perry), Connecticut, District of Columbia, Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and  Washington. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:08 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Sebelius et al, (downloads as pdf) was filed Thursday in the District Of Columbia District Court by twelve plaintiffs, comprised of individuals and companies. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Cacace involved the latest attempt to get the Court to explore whether its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]