Search for: "District of Columbia v. Barnes"
Results 61 - 80
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:41 pm
Those include California (post-Perry), Connecticut, District of Columbia, Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:08 pm
Sebelius et al, (downloads as pdf) was filed Thursday in the District Of Columbia District Court by twelve plaintiffs, comprised of individuals and companies. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
Cacace involved the latest attempt to get the Court to explore whether its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:50 am
District Court Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:52 am
In light of the decision in Loving et al v Commissioner where the court ruled that the Internal Revenue Service did not have the authority to regulate tax preparers, the IRS has issued the following statement: As of Friday, Jan. 18, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has enjoined the Internal Revenue Service from enforcing the regulatory requirements for registered tax return preparers. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 7:39 am
This resource provides a wide range of information for all fifty states plus the District of Columbia, regarding laws that restrict the use of cameras in and around polling places (as well as other journalistic activities). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia last week relied on Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act to bar Texas from enforcing its photo ID requirement for voters in this fall’s election. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:32 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes discusses amicus briefs filed on both sides in American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Pharmaceutical cases that warrant federal court multi-district litigation (MDL) treatment typically involve complex scientific and statistical issues. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
” At Fox News, Shannon Bream reports that gun ownership remains difficult to achieve in some parts of the country, notwithstanding the Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:55 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the reasoning on which they relied to reach that conclusion varied. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm
And then there’s M.G. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:00 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division (EEOC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm
Verizon (EDTexweblog.com) District Court Columbia: Bilski applied to invalidate computer system claims: CLS Bank Int’l v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Foxhall Surgical Assocs., 694 A.2d 435, 439-40 (D.C. 1997); Barnes v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:35 am
The merchants being investigated include: Barnes & Noble, Orbitz.com, Buy.com, Ticketmaster.com, MovieTickets.com, FTD.com, Shutterfly.com, 1-800Flowers.com, Avon.com, Budget, Staples.com, Priceline.com, GMAC Mortgage, Classmates.com, Travelocity, Vistaprint, Intelius, Hotwire.com, Expedia/Hotels.com, Columbia House, Pizza Hut and Gamestop/EB Games. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Applying Jackson, a federal district court concluded that “Arkansas has not adopted alternative or market share liability,” in Fields v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:31 pm
At her hearings last summer, she told the committee that she considered the court's 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
