Search for: "District of Columbia v. Brooke" Results 1 - 20 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 5:15 am
In two recent decisions, the United States Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the Seventh Circuit each split with the Second Circuit’s 2010 decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am by Heidi Henson
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May 14, 2012, Boasberg, J). [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:13 pm
 Fresh from his victory in District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:50 am by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Brooks received his J.D. from Yale Law School, and his B.A. from Columbia University. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 7:24 am
This, as Rowles J.A. noted, “risks perpetuating the very disadvantage and exclusion from mainstream society theCode is intended to remedy” (see Brooks v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:54 am by Heidi Henson
Last month, a federal district court in the District of Columbia upheld the notice-posting requirement, finding no evidence that Congress intended to preclude the board from promulgating such a rule. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
  Further, the Court in Brooks Furniture based its reading on the Supreme Court's decision in Professional Real Estate Investors v Columbia Pictures Industries (1993),  but Judge Rader considered that the Supreme Court's decision did not alter the traditional fee-shifting rule. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
Wald, former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:01 am by Rachel Bercovitz
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Backus Hospital, 864 A.2d 1, 18 (Conn. 2005) (rejecting lost chance doctrine altogether).District of Columbia:  Grant v. [read post]