Search for: "District of Columbia v. Brooke"
Results 81 - 100
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Jan. 12, 1987), federal district courts held that the rule precluded pharmacist liability. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm
In the case of Maras v Lesses ([2016] SADC 40) the District Court of South Australia awarded damages of Aus$75,000 to a member of the Greek Orthodox Community of South Australia against another member of the community in respect of a defamatory flyer, newsletter and email. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma & Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy in-licenses Inersan to CD Pharma to market in India and… [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
To learn more about Brookings research programs, click here. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 12:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Quicken Loans Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
” District of Columbia: D.C. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Upjohn Co., 778 A.2d 829, 836-37 (Conn. 2001).District of Columbia: Dyson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(Class 46) Council Regulation 1229/2008 enters San Simón da Costa (PDO), Ail blanc de Lomagne (PGI), Steirischer Kren (PGI) into Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Class 46) Court of First Instance, consolidating four appeals, annuls decisions of Board of Appeal and awards costs to Budvar in proceedings over BUD appellation: Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik v Office for Harmonisation in… [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:09 am
Brooks, 287 N.C. 392 (1975). [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 5:20 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (Patent Docs),US: Alnylam CEO forecasts ‘perfect storm’ for biomedical patents: (Patent Docs),US: Human Genome launches patent suit against Genentech over type of protein used to detect tumours: (IP Law360)Pharma & Biotech - ProductsCaduet (Atorvastatin/Amlodipine) – US: Pfizer sues Ranbaxy to block generic Caduet until 2016: (IP Law360),Dovonex (Calcipotriol) – Chancery Division EWHC grants interim injunction prohibiting Sandoz from distributing… [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:35 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the justification for executive privilege is the need to ensure that those advising the president do not “tempor candor with a concern for appearances” or “forego” certain duties “for fear of losing deniability. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
§ 194, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia has the “duty [] to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
.: The Brookings Institution will host an event on Hong Kong’s precarious future. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
., an EPA representative conducted compliance evaluation inspections at the university’s Danforth Campus, at One Brookings Drive, and at the School of Medicine, 660 S. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
District Court in TikTok Inc. et al. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 6:25 am
Pero ayer estuve reunida con el presidente de la Universidad del Distrito de Columbia, que fue una de las víctimas de la junta de control. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to limit lawyers handling appeals from military decisions classifying detainees as enemy combatants to three visits per client; to let the government read lawyer-client letters; and to let it deny the lawyers access to secret evidence. [read post]
