Search for: "District of Columbia v. Davis"
Results 41 - 60
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2014, 9:38 am
’ Davis v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:55 am
Here is the abstract: This article considers several issues raised by the Supreme Court's opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:33 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:33 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:33 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
Georgetown Law observes the centennial of United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 3:00 am
District of Columbia, 158 F.3d 1342, 1348-49 (D.C.Cir.1998) (same). [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
Davis, where the plaintiffs were applicants to the District of Columbia police force who claimed that the civil service examination used by the force had the effect of discriminating against African Americans in violation of equal protection. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 10:18 pm
District Judge Jed S. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:28 am
According to U.S. ex rel Davis v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 3:26 am
Davis was a very curious decision, seeking to invalidate “Test 21” to become a District of Columbia police officer because black test takers disproportionately failed the test because it was “culturally slanted to favor whites. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:14 pm
Menhart sued Thelaw.net alleging violations of the District of Columbia spam statute. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Fifty years ago today, Chief Justice Warren delivered the unanimous decision of the court; within that decision was this statement: In June 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a Negro woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia pursuant to its laws. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 4:07 pm
Davis L. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
In McLane v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:01 am
The case was taken to the US Supreme Court, and in 1953, she prevailed in District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:02 pm
It was obvious that such arms are "commonly used by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes," which is the Supreme Court's rule from District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 10:05 pm
Davis L. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
District Court for the District of Columbia 2013). [read post]
