Search for: "District of Columbia v. Heller"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
These cases should be decided in favor of a straightforward application of the constitutional test for addressing challenges to "arms ban" laws set forth in District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
See Columbia Hous. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm
Indeed, since the Supreme Court tethered their constitutionality to the existence of historical precedent in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 3:01 am
In 2008, the District of Columbia brought us District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
By the en banc majority's theory, lightly premised on a tendentious reading of the Supreme Court's District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
3/18/2008: District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:41 pm
Regardless of whether the district court received evidence on that question, and irrespective of what it might have purported to "find" about the topic, the Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm
Larry Kramer, a widely respected legal scholar and historian who was my constitutional law professor at N.Y.U. 20 years ago, called it quits in 2008, on the heels of the Supreme Court's divisive decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
Smith has explained, under District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
One impetus for Bruen was over a decade of judicial underenforcement of the Second Amendment following District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
” Justice Eddins is referencing District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 7:23 pm
An alternative analysis, where the missing conjunction is modeled as a covert proform, is proposed, and consequences of the analysis are considered – in particular, I present a novel argument that the US Supreme Court’s controversial decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:57 pm
An alternative analysis, where the missing conjunction is modeled as a covert proform, is proposed, and consequences of the analysis are considered – in particular, I present a novel argument that the US Supreme Court’s controversial decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm
"District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm
Park v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Calls to overrule District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:30 am
District of Columbia.2 This right is held by “the people. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:32 pm
The Supreme Court reaffirmed this tradition of “sensitive places” regulation in District of Columbia v. [read post]
