Search for: "District of Columbia v. Murphy"
Results 81 - 100
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 5:37 am
Fourteen states and the District of Columbia provided records that identified an applicant's race. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:22 pm
In Wendy Murphy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 12:22 pm
In Wendy Murphy v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 8:16 am
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio granted summary judgment to the defense in EEOC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the case of Ali Hamza Suliman Ahmad Al Bahlul v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Pharmaceutical cases that warrant federal court multi-district litigation (MDL) treatment typically involve complex scientific and statistical issues. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Columbia Cas. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:29 am
District of Columbia, No. 10-CV-632 (D.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:17 pm
Mildred was black and Richard was white, and after they were legally married in the District of Columbia, the state of Virginia prosecuted them under its Racial Integrity Act of 1924. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
Under the settlement filed in federal court in Columbia, S.C., Norfolk Southern will be required to pay a civil penalty of $3,967,500 for the alleged CWA violations, to be deposited in the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
86 (S.C.), or a shopping centre, as in Murphy v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
I'm sure the district attorney's office is burning the midnight oil to find some daylight in Arizona v. [read post]
