Search for: "District of Columbia v. Petty" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution prohibits “Bill[s] of Attainder,” laws that, under Supreme Court precedent, “legislatively determine[] guilt and inflict[] punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial” (Nixon v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
An example of this can be found in Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
An example of this can be found in Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-5288, Pettis v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Collateral Consequences as a Consideration in the Right to a Jury Trial Calculation On June 21, 2018 the District of Columbia Court of Appeals sitting en banc rendered a decision inJean-Baptiste Bado v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Collateral Consequences as a Consideration in the Right to a Jury Trial Calculation On June 21, 2018 the District of Columbia Court of Appeals sitting en banc rendered a decision inJean-Baptiste Bado v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
As Black notes, in many of the old cases “petty acts” that “no sensible person could think impeachable offenses” served as grounds for removal. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 4:08 am by SHG
Bush appointee to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 10:48 am by Jordyn Turner
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia voted unanimously to reverse the decision. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 8:29 am by Patrick Quinlan
  Section 5 then prohibited those jurisdictions from implementing any change affecting voting practices or procedures without preapproval from the United States Attorney General or the United States District Court for the District of Columbia that the change had no discriminatory purpose or effect. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Saywell Colonial Justice: Justice, Morality and Crime in the Niagara District, 1791-1849 by David Murray Canadian State Trials Volume Two: Rebellion and Invasion in the Canadas, 1837-8 edited by F. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:24 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Today, twenty-three states and the District of Columbia currently have laws legalizing marijuana for either medical or recreational use. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
SaywellColonial Justice: Justice, Morality and Crime in the Niagara District, 1791-1849 by David MurrayCanadian State Trials Volume Two: Rebellion and Invasion in the Canadas, 1837-8 edited by F. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am by admin
In 2010, the District of Columbia district court upheld the statute, but it was appealed a few weeks ago. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
Unlike the District of Columbia, where you can be fined for showing people where the Constitution is (Todd Henderson, Truth on the Market), the blogosphere allows me to serve as your meagerly-paid tour guide to the best of the blawgs. [read post]