Search for: "Division of Industrial Safety v. Municipal Court" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2016, 6:31 am
As used in division (A)(2)(a) of this section, "building, safety, or health requirements" does not include local zoning ordinances…” In other words, according to the court in Sines,“a municipality may not regulate the sale or use of alcoholic beverages at these operations in the guise of zoning. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 9:52 am by William A. Ruskin
In a unanimous Memorandum and Order issued by the Appellate Division, Fourth Department on December 27, 2013, in Ecogen v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
”[25]  A similar class action was recently dismissed from a San Francisco federal court in a case called O’Connor v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:12 pm by Lindsey A. Zahn
The Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Control of the Missouri Department of Public Safety denied SWSA’s application because the corporation did not satisfy the residency requirement of the state’s statute. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Central to the challenged EIR analyses were two categories of water:  (1) municipal and industrial (M&I) water, which is essentially fresh, potable water used for those purposes; and (2) “produced water,” which is groundwater found in oil and gas reservoirs and brought to the surface with the extracted resources, which usually is saline, poor quality, and unusable for agricultural, residential, commercial or industrial usage without substantial… [read post]