Search for: "Division of Industrial Safety v. Municipal Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2016, 6:31 am
As used in division (A)(2)(a) of this section, "building, safety, or health requirements" does not include local zoning ordinances…” In other words, according to the court in Sines,“a municipality may not regulate the sale or use of alcoholic beverages at these operations in the guise of zoning. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
”[25] A similar class action was recently dismissed from a San Francisco federal court in a case called O’Connor v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:48 am
The Court began the discussion by evaluating several cases that Adams Outdoor had already brought against other municipalities for the same/similar claims. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:12 pm
The Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Control of the Missouri Department of Public Safety denied SWSA’s application because the corporation did not satisfy the residency requirement of the state’s statute. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:09 am
The text of the March 22, 2012, decision in Cason-Merenda v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:36 pm
(Lotus v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Supreme Court affirmed in King, et al., v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:26 am
Clews Land and Livestock, LLC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court—the case is called UJ-Eighty Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
A Delaware court was less forgiving to a COVID-19 claim [ Hudson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 1:27 pm
For example, in 2005, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the right of municipalities to regulate environmental nuisances, in Montreal (Ville) v. 2952-1366 Quebec [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm
In March, the Supreme Court held in Lorenzo v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 7:23 am
Stunkel v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 7:23 am
Stunkel v. [read post]
