Search for: "Dixon v. Dixon"
Results 21 - 40
of 879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2008, 5:12 pm
Here's the Complaint, in Crystal Dixon v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:17 am
In Dixon v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Decided in 1918, the decision met with immediate outrage and an attempt at an Article V override. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 5:03 pm
Macrus Dixon (ND Ind., CJ Miller), and U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
As noted above, Dixon relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
Oral Argument in case# 11-3802; USA v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:56 am
Oral Argument in case: ; Charles Stainback v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 10:35 am
Derek Dixon, Jr. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 7:29 pm
Oral Argument in case: 08-1438; USA v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 10:35 am
Derek Dixon, Jr. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm
Dixon v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
On November 7, the Supreme Court reversed the Sixth Circuit's decision in Dixon v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm
Dixon v UK has now reached a conclusion in the ECHR with an Order made on 21/2/12 removing the case from the lists under Art 37 (1)(c) of the Convention.This Order is the Court’s response to a unilateral declaration made by the UK government on 8/11/11 accepting that Mr Dixon had not had the benefit of a proportionality exercise in line with the principles set out in McCann, Pinnock and Powell and that the High Court’s obiter findings… [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm
Dixon v UK has now reached a conclusion in the ECHR with an Order made on 21/2/12 removing the case from the lists under Art 37 (1)(c) of the Convention.This Order is the Court’s response to a unilateral declaration made by the UK government on 8/11/11 accepting that Mr Dixon had not had the benefit of a proportionality exercise in line with the principles set out in McCann, Pinnock and Powell and that the High Court’s obiter findings… [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:12 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2006, 8:08 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Friday granted certiorari [order, PDF] in the case of Dixon v. [read post]
25 Apr 2006, 7:39 pm
In Dixon v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:53 pm
.'s Office thinks it does, which is why it charged him (actually, Todd Dixon) with it, got a guilty verdict from a jury, and defended this verdict in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
Dixon noted that Ali v. [read post]
