Search for: "Dixon v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2021, 7:08 am by CMS
The Defendants relied on an early 20th Century authority of Channell J in Gelmini v Moriggia [1913] 2 KB 549, where it was clearly stated that: “…in all cases of contract the person who has to pay has the whole of the day upon which payment is due in which to pay; therefore until the expiration of that day an action cannot be brought because until then there is no complete cause of action. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:54 am
Mr Justice Burton concluded his judgment by stating that the choice by an insured of his own lawyer did not "of itself constitute the taking of an unreasonable step".___________________________________ 1(1) Christine Brown-Quinn (2) Webster Dixon LLP v (1) Equity Syndicate Management Ltd (2) Motorplus Ltd: Webster Dixton LLP v (1) Equity Syndicate Management Ltd (2) ACM ULR Ltd: (1) Janine Baxter (2) Webster Dixon LLP v (1) Equity… [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm by Larry Tolchinsky
That question is answered in another new Florida appeals court decision, Dixon v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:25 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Court Need Not Consider Disparities Between Federal, State Penalties When Sentencing Federal Defendant United States v. [read post]