Search for: "Dmitry Karshtedt" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2011, 4:46 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Most of these papers are not available on SSRN or elsewhere yet, but you can read Dmitry Karshtedt's Did Learned Hand Get It Wrong? [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:38 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
"Dmitry Karshtedt (Law & Biosciences Fellow, Stanford): Courts have imposed "completeness requirement" based on hodgepodge of doctrines; should recognize in new statutory provision and create new "research patent" for claims that meet other standards but fail completeness.Shawn Miller (Lecturer & Fellow, Stanford; co-author: Mark Lemley): District court judges are less likely to be reversed by the Federal Circuit after they sit with that court by… [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:09 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
" Edit: In case you missed it, my co-blogger Dmitry Karshtedt had a nice post on this article back in November. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 10:42 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
 Dmitry Karshtedt, in his excellent commentary on their paper at PatCon, agreed. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:05 am by Josh Wright
Paul Tanpitukpongse, 3L, University of New Hampshire School of Law The Relevance of Proven Acts of Direct Infringement to Indirect Infringement Damages: Reasonable Royalties, Unreasonable Confusion, and a Proposed Solution - Dmitry Karshtedt, 3L, Stanford Law School Efficient Outcomes Through Reasonable Negotiations: Restoring Sanity to the Calculation of Patent Damages - Anthony K. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 7:18 am by Dennis Crouch
Dmitry Karshtedt, Acceptance Instead of Denial: Pro-Applicant Positions at the PTO, 23 B.U. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 2:33 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
#PatCon9— 𝐒𝐚𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐡 𝐕𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐧𝐮𝐛𝐡𝐚𝐤𝐚𝐭 (@emptydoors) April 5, 2019At #PatCon9, Dmitry Karshtedt argues courts should classify evidence into ex ante and ex post categories in assessing obviousness. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 2:33 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
#PatCon9— 𝐒𝐚𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐡 𝐕𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐧𝐮𝐛𝐡𝐚𝐤𝐚𝐭 (@emptydoors) April 5, 2019At #PatCon9, Dmitry Karshtedt argues courts should classify evidence into ex ante and ex post categories in assessing obviousness. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dmitry Karshtedt, George Washington University Law School: Interesting tensions in this area. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dmitry Karshtedt: Overlap with constitutional issues in patent: resolution of claims in administrative proceeding. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 12:26 pm by Jason Rantanen
  Thanks to Dmitry Karshtedt for alerting me to this change! [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:15 pm by Jason Rantanen
” Thanks to Dennis Crouch, Dmitry Karshtedt, Chris Seaman and Timothy Holbrook for helpful discussions relevant to this post. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:39 am by Jason Rantanen
Thanks to Dmitry Karshtedt for calling these two Law360 articles to my attention. [read post]
In the United States, a judge may increase the damages for patent infringement up to threefold[1] resulting in awards of millions, or even billons, of dollars. [read post]