Search for: "Doctor v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 9,512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2024, 1:52 am by Yosi Yahoudai
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court will consider Wednesday when doctors can provide abortions during medical emergencies in states with bans enacted after the high court’s sweeping decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 9:28 pm
The New England Journal of Medicine has filed an amicus brief in the United States Supreme Court arguing that lawsuits against drug companies benefit the medical practice by getting information about harmful effects of drugs into the hands of both doctors and the public.The case is Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 2:25 am
Regina (TF) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “A prisoner could be transferred to a mental hospital at the end of his sentence, only if two doctors recommended it and his medical condition and treatability justified it. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 10:27 am by admin
Kadlec Medical Center, Division III of the Washington State Court of Appeals, overturned the dismissal of a doctor’s racial discrimination and retaliation claims. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:35 am
Refusal to provide doctor’s note concerning absence from workCarr v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:58 pm
Doe:He is a doctor from Missouri called Dr. [read post]
” In various judgments, such as Paschim v State of West Bengal, State of Punjab v Mohinder and Parmanand v Union of India, the Supreme Court of India has continually interpreted Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) of the Constitution to include the right to health. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:48 am by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
In an exciting win for Florida personal injury plaintiffs and their physicians, the state’s Supreme Court issued a recent landmark decision in the case of Worley v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:58 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
Woodruff, North Carolina Family Law Specialist Winston Salem, North Carolina: Malecek v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:44 am
R (BAPIO Action Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another [2008] UKHL 27; [2008] WLR (D) 133 “Departmental guidance to NHS trusts which had the effect of preventing trainee doctors from overseas being offered postgraduate training places in NHS hospitals was unlawful. [read post]
1 May 2008, 2:18 am
Regina (BAPIO Action Ltd and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another House of Lords “Government guidance to National Health Service employers which had the effect of preventing overseas trainee doctors from being offered postgraduate training places in NHS hospitals was unlawful. [read post]