Search for: "Dodd v. Hall " Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2013, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
The anti-retaliation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act does not extend beyond U.S. soil, a federal district court in New York ruled, dismissing the retaliation claims of a China-based compliance officer for a German corporation’s Chinese subsidiary (Liu v Siemens, A.G., October 21, 2013, Pauley, W, III). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:11 am by New Books Script
42 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 29 from 2011: HV 875.58 C3 B34 2011 The traffic in babies : cross-border adoption and baby-selling between the United States and Canada, 1930-1972 Karen A. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:11 pm
Read more… or Read more right here… » Here are the first set of cases: Davies v East, January 8, 1788 Ormond v Payne, July 9, 1789 The King v Dodd, May 30, 1808 R v Burdett, November 28, 1820 Collins v Godefroy, January 18, 1831 Vaughan v Menlove, August 2, 1836 Priestly v Fowler, January 17, 1837 Attwood v Small, March 27, 1838 M'Kinnell v Robinson, May 1,… [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Freed, Center for Political Accountability, on Friday, February 26, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:06 am by Maria Roche
The Court went on to consider the formula in  R v Hemsley [2010] EWCA Crim 225, which restricts internet use to “job search, study, work, lawful recreation and purchases”.   [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:17 pm by Amy Howe
The justices declined to take up the case of Peruta v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:34 am by Ronald K.L. Collins
” “In 2014, the court of appeals ruled that this requirement was reasonable and consistent with Dodd-Frank. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:06 am by Ronald K.L. Collins
The panel held that a part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (15 U.S.C. [read post]