Search for: "Dodd v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,027
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2015, 8:29 am
Verble v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
In general, an indictment that tracks the words of a statute to state the elements crime is acceptable, provided that it states sufficient facts to place a defendant on notice of the specific conduct at issue. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:30 pm
In New York v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:07 am
Richards v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
Alsip v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:57 pm
But a two-judge majority upon panel rehearing in the conflict minerals case hewed closely to its earlier opinion, although it offered a second basis for its decision in order to account for the AMI case.As a result, the SEC’s rule and the Dodd-Frank Act provision are unconstitutional to the extent they require regulated entities to report to the Commission and to state on their website that any of their products have “not been found to be ‘DRC conflict free. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:43 am
Mishkin The CFPB’s constitutionality is back before the D.C. federal district court, with the private plaintiffs in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
The SLB also touches on the Rule 14a-8(i)(7) litigation playing out in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 12:37 pm
Berman v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 7:07 am
Ficklin proudly stated that the CFPB, within just one day, modified its services to support this rare dialect. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 3:05 pm
The case, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:38 am
On Thursday, September 10, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its highly anticipated decision in Berman v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:50 am
The court adopted GE Energy’s argument that Dodd-Frank did not protect employees against retaliation in response to internal reporting, stating that “[u]nder Dodd-Frank’s plain language and structure, there is only one category of whistleblowers: individuals who provide information relating to a securities law violation to the SEC. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
Delaware Court Questions Disclosure-Only Settlement of Merger Objection Lawsuit: As discussed here, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:33 am
Circuit to rehear the case in light of the outcome of an unrelated First Amendment lawsuit, American Meat Institute v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 5:54 pm
Wyndham Worldwide – What it Means for Hotel Owners by Bob Braun, Hotel Lawyer and Data Security Advisor Background on the case On August 24, 2015, the Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued its ruling in the case FTC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:08 am
” Malecki Law had reported on this Wall Street Journal article and examined the state of Dodd-Frank Whistleblower program, as it existed then, in this blog post. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:19 am
The Dodd-Frank Act (Act) Section 1502 addressed these “conflict minerals” —tantalum, tin, tungsten and gold—by directing the SEC, the Department of State (State), the U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm
” The appellate court added that “other courts interpreting identical insured v. insured exclusions have reached the same conclusion. [read post]
