Search for: "Dodd v. U. S" Results 1 - 20 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2015, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
She could not be compelled to arbitrate her SOX claim because Dodd-Frank’s amendment to SOX rendered the Form U-4 agreement to arbitrate unenforceable as to that claim. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm by Jason M. Halper
The court adopted GE Energy’s argument that Dodd-Frank did not protect employees against retaliation in response to internal reporting, stating that “[u]nder Dodd-Frank’s plain language and structure, there is only one category of whistleblowers: individuals who provide information relating to a securities law violation to the SEC. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:50 am by Jason M. Halper
The court adopted GE Energy’s argument that Dodd-Frank did not protect employees against retaliation in response to internal reporting, stating that “[u]nder Dodd-Frank’s plain language and structure, there is only one category of whistleblowers: individuals who provide information relating to a securities law violation to the SEC. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 9:34 am by Larry Ribstein
  We have a response, if not definitive answer, in VC Laster’s decision in Lonergan v. [read post]