Search for: "Dodd v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2018, 12:49 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Somers, the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided that employees who raise internal complaints about possible violation of securities laws are not protected as whistleblowers under the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:36 pm by Holland & Hart
By Brian Neil Hoffman and Jeremy Ben Merkelson Brian Neil Hoffman The United States Supreme Court today narrowed the universe of plaintiffs who can claim protection under the whistleblower anti-retaliation provisions of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank). [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:36 pm by Holland & Hart
By Brian Neil Hoffman and Jeremy Ben Merkelson Brian Neil Hoffman The United States Supreme Court today narrowed the universe of plaintiffs who can claim protection under the whistleblower anti-retaliation provisions of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:27 am by Lawrence Solum
This conventional wisdom springs from a long-standing legal tradition, originating with McCulloch v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Jason M. Knott
That’s the message the United States Supreme Court sent to whistleblowers with its decision yesterday in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"There is absolutely nothing in the [statute], or in the legislative history of the Dodd-Frank Act, that suggests that Congress intended the antiretaliation provision to regulate the relationships between foreign employers and their foreign employees working outside the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:34 am by Matthew D. Lee
McCoy have published an alert about the United States Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling narrowing the class of would-be whistleblowers under the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:54 pm by Walter Olson
United States that the Sarbanes-Oxley accounting law’s prohibition on evasive destruction of “tangible objects” cannot be used to prosecute a fisherman who discarded undersized grouper in hopes of avoiding enforcement. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 10:56 am by Gary Enis
Last week, the United States Supreme Court released its decision in Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Ernest Badway
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia recently decided that the SEC did not have the power to impose collateral bars on conduct pre-July 2010. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:37 am by John Jascob
Jason Howard, J.D.The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has determined that a former UBS employee's testimony before FINRA did not equate to providing information to the SEC as required by the Dodd-Frank Act’s definition of “whistleblower” (Price v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:43 am by Jason Kaufman
Energy United States, LLC, that an employee who only reports a suspected violation internally is not a protected whistleblower for the purposes of Dodd-Frank’s anti-relation provision. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:38 am
On Thursday, September 10, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its highly anticipated decision in Berman v. [read post]