Search for: "Dodd v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2018, 2:45 pm
United States 17-1099 Issues: (1) Whether the “anti-spoofing” provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:24 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, Respondent, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit admonished the Securities and Exchange Commission that the federal regulator's imposition of a collateral bar for pre-Dodd Frank misconduct was an impermissible retroactive sanction. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
§ 78u-6(h)(1)(a), apply to an employee who is terminated by a non-U.S. corporation that does business in (and is regulated by) the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:46 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia last week struck down the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)’s Position Limits for Futures and Swaps final rule and interim final rule in International Swaps and Derivatives Association v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 7:32 am
Thousands of Whistleblowers At-Risk of Losing Protection WASHINGTON, DC – DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES, November 28, 2017 — The United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument today in a major precedent setting whistleblower case, Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:26 pm
The comments were submitted at the SEC’s invitation as the Commission prepares a report mandated by Section 929Y of Dodd-Frank to address whether the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:17 am
United States of America v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 4:42 am
(Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief / Emergency Temporary Restraining Order Sought / United States District Court for the District of Columbia / 17-CV-02534 / November 26, 2017) http://brokeandbroker.com/PDF/EnglishvTrump.pdf As set forth in the "Summary" of the Complaint:The Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as an independent federal agency, to be led by a single director. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:44 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:11-cv-02075). [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:54 pm
Dodd-Frank aimed to “promote the financial stability of the United States by improving accountability and transparency in the financial system,” according to the legislative record. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:42 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:28 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:47 am
On February 11th, the three private plaintiff-appellants and eleven State plaintiff-appellants in State National Bank of Big Spring, et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 5:56 pm
Supreme Court’s June 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm
United States, 276 U.S. 394, 406, 48 S.Ct. 348, 351, 72 L.Ed. 624 (1928). [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 9:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:41 am
See Dodd v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 4:15 pm
A split on this issue has developed within the federal circuit courts and now the United States Supreme Court may have the opportunity to address the question. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:05 pm
In addition, the decision in Cuomo v. [read post]
