Search for: "Dodd v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2013, 6:19 am
Raul v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 11:36 am
Foreign financial institutions seeking to offer them to retail customers within the United States will now have to offer such contracts through one of the other legal mechanisms available under the CEA for accessing U.S. retail customers. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:02 am
Senator Kay Hagan (D-NC) was pleased to see that the Volcker Rule as modified by the Dodd-Frank Act will permit banking entities several years to bring their full range of activities into conformance with the new rule. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 1:43 pm
It translates: The Supreme Court of the United States today decided that the power of the President of the United States does not extend to the Philippines, on the ground that all past Congressional legislation on the subject is unconstitutional. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 6:35 am
Based on this rule, in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
– United States District Court – Western District of Kentucky – November 13th, 2015 – This is a contract case involving imported gift products into the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 10:32 am
One obvious provision is Section 604, which amends the Bank Holding Company Act to direct the Federal Reserve to consider, when it evaluates an application for approval of a proposed acquisition, merger, or consolidation, whether it would result in greater or more concentrated risks to the stability of the United States banking or financial system. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 8:23 am
The Use of Non-Regulatory Methods for Regulatory Ends -United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:52 am
” The Act defines “International Insurance Agreements on Prudential Matters” as a written agreement between the United States and one or more foreign governments, authorities or regulatory entities with respect to prudential measurers concerning the business of insurance or reinsurance.For the complete text of the Act (see pages 304 through 341 for Title V), click here.We will continue to monitor the Act and provide updates on InsureReinsure.com. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:38 am
A couple of weeks ago, a three-judge panel of the United States Circuit Court (for the non-lawyers: the highest Federal courts except for the Supreme Court) decided the case of SEC v Scoville, which in effect held that the SEC has enforcement powers against alleged securities frauds which are primarily extra-territorial. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:38 am
A couple of weeks ago, a three-judge panel of the United States Circuit Court (for the non-lawyers: the highest Federal courts except for the Supreme Court) decided the case of SEC v Scoville, which in effect held that the SEC has enforcement powers against alleged securities frauds which are primarily extra-territorial. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 9:24 am
In Morrison v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm
Judge Atlas found that the language of the Dodd-Frank Anti-Retaliation Provision is silent about its extraterritorial applicability and held that there is a “presumption that the Provision does not govern conduct outside the United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm
Judge Atlas found that the language of the Dodd-Frank Anti-Retaliation Provision is silent about its extraterritorial applicability and held that there is a “presumption that the Provision does not govern conduct outside the United States. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:00 am
” McCoy v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:39 am
Asadi v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am
All placements of insurance in the United States are generally subject to state premium taxation, but the responsible taxpayer depends on the type of insurance policy issued. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:15 pm
Supreme Court’s Morrison v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 8:01 am
United States and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 1:20 pm
"Section 929P of the Dodds-Frank Act, enacted into law less than one month after the Morrison decision, supported the SEC extraterritorial approach by amending the Securities Act and the Exchange Act to provide that the U.S. courts have jurisdiction over "(1) conduct within the United States that constitutes significant steps in furtherance of the violation, even if the securities transaction occurs outside the United States and involves only… [read post]
