Search for: "Dodge v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 939
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 12:07 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Consent to search On September 20, 2018, two officers of the Howard County Police Department, Stephen Vinias and John Beamer, observed several individuals, including Appellant, Shabazz Watkins, enter a red Dodge Charger in the parking lot of a Red Roof Inn on Route 1 in Jessup, Maryland. ... [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
In reaching this conclusion, the Ninth Circuit primarily applied the framework in Boumediene v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
So was Judge Milazzo engaged in judicial dodging in Her Honor’s opinion in Taxotere? [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:54 am by Schachtman
”) (quoting Advisory Committee Note to 2000 Amendments to Rule 702); Citizens State Bank v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 1:58 pm
Contents include:ArticlesMiguel Lemos, Jus Cogens Versus the Chapter VII Powers of the Security Council: With Particular References to Humanitarian Intervention and Terrorism Carlo Focarelli, International Human Rights “in Crisis” and the Neoliberalization of the Human Person William S Dodge, Jurisdiction, State Immunity, and Judgments in the Restatement (Fourth) of US Foreign Relations Law Deming Huang & Qintong Shan, The Immunity of Judge Akay of the MICT … [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
”[15] On a positive note, some courts have recognized that responding with the conclusory assessment of a challenge’s going to weight not admissibility is a delegation of the court’s gatekeeping duty to the jury.[16] In 2018, Professor Daniel Capra, the Reporter to the Rules Committee addressed the “weight not admissibility dodge” at length in his memorandum to the Rules Committee: “Rule 702 clearly states that these are questions of… [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
In my last post,[1] I praised Lee Mickus’s recent policy paper on amending Rule 702 for its persuasive force on the need for an amendment, as well as a source for helping lawyers anticipate common judicial dodges to a faithful application of the rule.[2] There are multiple dodges used by judicial dodgers, and it behooves litigants to recognize and anticipate them. [read post]