Search for: "Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2013, 9:11 am by Eric Goldman
He fought the Massachusetts Sex Offender Registry Board’s determination that he needed to register as a level 3 sex offender. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:30 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Article here; toplines here.Overwhelming majorities favor a public registry for sex offenders, continuing registration requirements after completion of parole, and even indefinite detention. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 12:35 pm by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
 After entering his plea, however, the juvenile filed a motion asking the judge to relieve him of the obligation to registry with the Massachusetts Sex Offender Registry Board. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
Convicted sex offenders must register with the Sex Offender Registry Board (board), which then determines the classification level of the offender. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 1:10 pm by Daniel Cappetta
He was required to register with the Sex Offender Registry Board (SORB), and provide SORB with notice of any change of address. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 6:29 pm by JaneAnne
Lunsford, a registered sex offender in Missouri, had boarded a flight to the Philippines and did not return. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 6:32 am by Ted Frank
[Slate] Innocent identity theft victim can't get himself from Washington state sex offender registry. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:33 am by Emma Quinn-Judge
 Feliz had “no prior record of a sex offense”; “no psychiatric diagnosis indicating a compulsion toward sexually deviant activity; no history of violations of probation or terms of pretrial release;” no exclusion zones entered into the GPS monitoring system; “no geographically proximate victim”; and had been classified by the Sex Offender Registry Board as a level one sex offender, meaning… [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:47 am by Eric Goldman
Based on these allegations, the Court could reasonably conclude that Defendant created a portion of his websites’ content by adding the personal information of those Plaintiffs not listed on preexisting sex offender registries and misidentifying them as individuals who have been convicted of a sex-related offense. [read post]