Search for: "Doe"
Results 121 - 140
of 485,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2025, 2:29 pm
The amount of time considered too short in Does 1-3 was nine days. [read post]
20 May 2025, 1:52 pm
The court of appeals has fast-tracked the case, Jackson noted, and Libby does not contend that she will miss any important votes while her appeal continues. [read post]
20 May 2025, 1:51 pm
Despite massive attempted layoffs and cancellation of third-party vendor contracts, the Trump Administration did not and does not intend to shut down the CFPB, a Justice Department attorney told a federal appeals court on May16 in connection with oral arguments on the government’s appeal of the preliminary injunction issued by the District Court, which essentially required the government to maintain the status quo pending the outcome of the litigation.... [read post]
20 May 2025, 1:08 pm
John Doe Summonses: Uncovering Financial Information Harper’s case has focused attention on the IRS’s use of John Doe summonses in the debate over financial privacy and government overreach. [read post]
20 May 2025, 12:57 pm
This led to the following discussion in the opinion:"In their appellate briefing, Defendants state that “[t]he Resolution does not ban discussions on slavery, historical figures (i.e., Jim Crow), or the human rights issues concerning such topics. [read post]
20 May 2025, 12:51 pm
These statistics may bring a feeling of comfort and safety, especially when comparing to others nearby (think Cook County, Illinois), but this does not mean that LaPorte is free from the danger of severe or deadly bodily harm in a semi-truck crash. [read post]
20 May 2025, 12:49 pm
How much does it cost to hire your firm? [read post]
20 May 2025, 12:31 pm
The Act makes it a federal crime for individual posters to knowingly share or threaten to share NCII, including AI-generated images that depict real people, and clarifies that consent to create an image does not mean consent to share it. [read post]
20 May 2025, 12:23 pm
Does it violate a representative's First Amendment rights to be subject to sanction under such rules, and does it make a difference what the sanction is? [read post]
20 May 2025, 11:48 am
Potentially use your collision insurance if your UM coverage does not fully address the damages you sustained. [read post]
20 May 2025, 11:39 am
Filing a lawsuit does not mean your case will definitely go to court. [read post]
20 May 2025, 11:32 am
If it does, the action requires “clear congressional authorization. [read post]
20 May 2025, 11:02 am
” Having said that, SB 21 does nothing to alter the laws of states other than Delaware. [read post]
20 May 2025, 11:02 am
The court emphasized that the LWDA’s role as a real party in interest does not extend to liability for litigation costs incurred by a prevailing defendant. [read post]
20 May 2025, 10:31 am
” This type of coverage is designed to help people when the person who caused the accident does not have insurance or cannot be identified, like in a hit-and-run. [read post]
20 May 2025, 10:26 am
The mere existence of multiple works does not prove access. [read post]
20 May 2025, 10:18 am
Compensation may include: Non-economic loss (pain and suffering) Economic loss (lost income and benefits) Wrongful death awards Eligibility for the VCF is limited to individuals who were: Present in the VCF NYC Exposure Zone (south of Canal Street in Manhattan) between September 11, 2001, and May 30, 2002 Working or volunteering as a responder at any recognized 9/11 crash or cleanup site, including the Pentagon and Shanksville, PA Unlike the WTCHP, the VCF does not cover… [read post]
20 May 2025, 10:00 am
What Does a DNR Order Do? [read post]
20 May 2025, 9:38 am
” Thus, the Federal Circuit reasoned that “because [under § 311(b)] the basis can only include prior art consisting of patents or printed publications . . . it follows that the plain meaning of § 311(b) does not permit the basis to include AAPA. [read post]
20 May 2025, 9:00 am
And again: JUSTICE KAGAN: I think that the question that this case presents is that if one thinks that it's quite clear that the EO is illegal, how does one get to that result, and in what time frame, on your set of rules without the possibility of a nationwide injunction? [read post]
