Search for: "Doe Defendants I through X" Results 41 - 60 of 718
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2020, 6:38 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  It is when journalists say foolish things that I call them out for the foolishness, not for being journalists.And as a mirror image of Chotiner's "I'm not even an economist, but somehow I figured this out," my writings often take this approach: "I'm pretty sure that journalists are supposed to do X, but this journalist is doing not-X, and even I can see through it. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
As a resource for class action defense attorneys who defend against RESPA (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act) class actions, we provide the text of Regulation X. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:28 pm by Eva Galperin
” Opposing counsel argued that Secret does not violate the constitution because it is technically possible for the company to trace who is posting anonymous messages through email and phone records. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:06 pm
Saying, "I do not like X," does not necessarily mean that "I dislike X," because it is also possible for one neither to like nor to dislike X. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 3:29 am
Let's give everyone who blogs for education or love of writing and who does so with consistency and quality a pat on the back for a job well done. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:53 pm
In theory, "anyone" could make the type of argument outlined here, saying "patent X" keeps me from "speaking" about Y, which inhibits my first amendment rights, which therefore does NOT promote the progress. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 6:57 am
Thanks to Corriere, not only do I know something about it, but I am also keen to watch X Factor as soon as I set foot in my beloved home country again. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 8:23 pm by David Frakt
  As an experienced criminal defense attorney (I’m currently back on active duty with the Air Force defending a capital murder case), I know very well what it is like to defend a position when the overwhelming weight of evidence is against you, so I don’t envy Dean Conison’s position. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:47 am by Eric Turkewitz
How does one prove intent from mouse clicking the wrong file to play in the courtroom? [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 6:57 am
Though the parole board and the Attorney General defend the process, even victim rights advocates think the whole hog approach (giving every person with a sexual related offense "Condition X") waters down registration and makes it less useful and more harmful:Parole board member [Jose] Aliseda acknowledges that the restrictions make life difficult, but "I see success stories all the time," he said. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:05 pm
  However, I feel rather comfortable saying that x + y > x, when x and y are both positive numbers. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
  Here, the Court held that the FAA does not allow courts to invalidate a class arbitration waiver through the effective vindication exception. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
  The per curiam decision does not reveal whether the American Medical Association ethical and practice guidelines, discussed more fully below, were raised in support of the plaintiff’s claim. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm
Unfortunately, the injury is commonly a result of medical negligence in which a doctor does not notice that a baby is too big to pass through the birth canal without injury. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:40 am by Andrew Delaney
Reading the Rules of Civil Procedure is a bit like reading the dictionary—hardly anyone does it for fun. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 9:37 am by Ron Coleman
And once it does so, there is no vigilantism — you now have the permission of the law to do x. [read post]