Search for: "Doe Defendants I through X"
Results 61 - 80
of 973
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
If a private firm offered to defend me against foreign invaders, I won't voluntarily sign on. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:34 pm
App’x. 875, 879 (11th Cir. 2015) (internal quotations omitted)). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
“policy arguments”: Is X good or bad for the polity? [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 11:54 pm
For example, if a defendant is on benefit and does not own anything valuable, the chances of getting paid are low. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
It's based on amicus briefs that Michael Dorf (Cornell), Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern), and I filed in past cases (and that I blogged about before), but it elaborates somewhat further on that argument. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:21 am
In some cases, of course, this is as simple as saying: “The contract requires the defendant to pay me $X, the defendant did not pay me anything, therefore the breach of contract lost me $X. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
"🧵1/X— Florian Mueller (@FOSSpatents) June 17, 2023 I'll also discuss it in detail in a Twitter Space at 12 noon Eastern Time today that will be recorded. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 7:00 pm
I noted some of the subtlety in a short 2006 essay ("Las ideas no se matan! [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 5:59 pm
By requiring the inclusion of X and Y, they necessarily leave less time for Z. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:15 am
Thus, the current state of law appears to be that a court must set aside a rule as procedurally invalid if the agency does not adequately consider and respond to significant public comments. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:15 pm
Some of my best Virginia criminal plea negotiations come when I least expect them, sometimes after I merely say to the prosecutor in passing, something along the lines of: "Since you are not going to agree to a plea of X, we will simply go to trial", and sometimes the prosecutor agrees to X. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:16 pm
” Importantly, the cover note states that it “is intended for use as evidence that insurance described herein has been effected against which a policy(ies) will be issued and that in the event of any inconsistency therewith the terms and conditions and provisions of the policy(ies) prevail. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
“I further indicated a number of unlawful means, including more additional false statements, including statements that were planned to be made to tax authorities. [read post]
16 May 2023, 5:01 am
” One anonymous CNN staffer even called it “one of the worst hours I’ve ever seen on our air. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am
Less obviously, that X is a legal cause of Y does not entail that X is a cause-in-fact of Y. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:00 am
The presumption of innocence does not mean that a defendant actually is innocent until proven guilty. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 12:49 pm
Soon after I posted, a reader asked whether introducing those records through an affidavit from a records custodian violates a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him or her. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
Argument [I.] [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 12:01 am
And so I had been talking to Andrea Dehlenedorf who does labor organizing for United for Respect, and she's worked a lot with Amazon workers and Walmart workers. [read post]
