Search for: "Doe Defendants I through X"
Results 141 - 160
of 973
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2010, 11:25 am
The United States argues that the defendant was the true addressee; hence, why isn't that binding on the government, as an admission that the defendant does have standing? [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
Defendant: Yes, I do.U.S. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Argument [I.] [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:48 am
This is the case because it is rare to be able to get evidence from the defendant through American-style discovery. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
Dobson, supra.The outcome of the trial was that “the jury found Defendants guilty on Counts 1, 5 through 8, 11, and 12. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:55 pm
For example, if an expert analysis showed that the exploit only worked against Windows PCs, a defendant who exclusively used a Mac OS X could argue that the defendant must have been misidentified. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
In another strand of my work, I defend the public provision of fertility treatment on three grounds. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:34 am
While the Dinner Journal circumstantially evinces Defendants' political affiliations, it does not totally undermine Plaintiff's allegations or the email in question so as to establish a complete documentary defense. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Paul Ricoeur, Le juste, I & IIIn my search for a metalegal level, meeting Ricoeur – as part of a small group defending the sans papiers, immigrant working families facing deportation – was decisive with their families. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am
I thought I would run through some of the allegations as well as the major legal issues they raise. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
App’x 754 (10th Cir. 2021) touched on snap removal in a different context. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:49 pm
I have a strong opinion that in most sex cases, the defendant should plead not guilty and demand trial. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
The Federal Circuit previously held that any change to the claims, whether it was made express in the language of the claims or implied through arguments made during reexamination of the patent, was sufficient to give rise to intervening rights to the defendant. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
I'm not quite sure how either normative or cognitive values impacted the objectivity of the theory and experimental evidence of DNA, nor how they might impact the proposition "the light was red when the defendant went through the intersection. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
App’x 933, 941 (11th Cir. 2009) (holding that because the Guidelines are not mandatory, the fact that a covered complex does not comply with the Guidelines does not establish a violation of the FHAA); United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
Assume I've been appointed to represent a criminal defendant on appeal. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am
Less obviously, that X is a legal cause of Y does not entail that X is a cause-in-fact of Y. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
Less obviously, that X is a legal cause of Y does not entail that X is a cause-in-fact of Y. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:13 pm
Less obviously, that X is a legal cause of Y does not entail that X is a cause-in-fact of Y. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:03 pm
One of the things that struck me when I read the last batch of letters sent to defendants in Harris County criminal cases was the common use of the word “reasonable” to describe fees. [read post]
