Search for: "Doe et al v. United Behavioral Health et al" Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm by Carl Custer
References: American Public Health Association, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:35 pm by Unknown
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2020-2021update.html Two petitions for certiorari were denied on 6/28/21:Phillips, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:26 am
Pulse Electronics, Inc., et al., No. 14-1513, and Stryker Corp. et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:41 pm by Bill Marler
Kirkland, KB, et al., “Steaming oysters does not prevent Norwalk-like gastroenteritis,” PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, Vol. 111, pp. 527-30 (1996). [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Bill Marler
E. coli O157:H7 does not make the animals that carry it ill; the animals are merely the reservoir for the bacteria. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 10:58 am by Drew Falkenstein
 [5, 25, 33] If a known norovirus outbreak is in progress, public health officials may obtain specimens from ill individuals for testing in a lab. [5, 9] These lab tests consist of identifying norovirus under an electron microscope. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:47 am by Bill Marler
 [5, 25, 33] If a known norovirus outbreak is in progress, public health officials may obtain specimens from ill individuals for testing in a lab. [5, 9] These lab tests consist of identifying norovirus under an electron microscope. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:44 pm by Bill Marler
 [5, 25, 33] If a known norovirus outbreak is in progress, public health officials may obtain specimens from ill individuals for testing in a lab. [5, 9] These lab tests consist of identifying norovirus under an electron microscope. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 8:13 pm by Bill Marler
 [5, 25, 33] If a known norovirus outbreak is in progress, public health officials may obtain specimens from ill indi [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:53 am
  (26-CA-22031, et al.; 351 NLRB No. 74) Grenada, MS Dec. 21, 2007. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 10:14 am by Rich
United Behavioral Health et al., addressed the canard that an insurer’s decision just has to be upheld if it supported by any reasonable basis, and said that no longer holds water:We wrote twenty-three years ago in Horan v. [read post]