Search for: "Doe v. Brown University"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
For Sunstein, originalism is unable to accommodate cases such as Brown v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:43 pm
Brown). [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:30 pm
Brown (School of Law, University of Aberdeen) and Charlotte Waelde (Centre for Dance Research, Coventry University) published in 2018, forms part of Edward Elgar Publishers, prestigious ‘Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property’ series, edited by none other than IPKat’s Professor Jeremy Phillips. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:03 am
Constitutional law, according to the author, is Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Under this “classification-rather-than-class-of-persons” approach, if race is a problematic basis for sorting people (because its use historically has generated socio-political costs) in cases like Brown v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Board of Trustees of the California State University (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 446. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 9:10 am
From Krasno v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
This practice of "red-lining" led to segregated neighborhoods which, even post-Brown v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
Robertson is the Vinson & Elkins Chair at the University of Texas School of Law. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 3:02 am
The concept of cumulative error does not require reversal of McClelland's conviction. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 10:39 pm
The Founding-era record does not support any of these contentions. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Loving v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Brown in 2011. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
Brown, Stephanie J. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, politicians and pundits went public with a parade of horribles – from the criminalization of contraceptives to the reversal of Brown v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm
At some point, the Supreme Court’s case law says, the taint of the unlawful search or seizure is so attenuated that the resulting evidence can be admitted.The leading case is the 1975 Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 1:48 pm
In the case of Jose v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:18 am
Circuit released its opinion in Al Bihani v. [read post]
