Search for: "Doe v. Brown University" Results 61 - 80 of 1,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Applying this guidance, in Board of Regents of the University of Texas System v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:15 am
Since the Court overturned the verdict solely on the basis of the expert witness issue, it raises once again the question posed by Jay Brown of the Sturm School of Law at the University of Denver. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:27 am by Dennis Crouch
By Professor John Golden, Professor in Law, The University of Texas at Austin Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:01 am
Calling it something else does not change the type of meat produced.' In effect, the district court reasoned that states may ban the slaughter of certain species, but once a state allows a species to be slaughtered, it cannot impose further restrictions. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 8:10 am by Ilya Somin
Consider two of the most famous Supreme Court decisions: Brown v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by ernst
He criticized his predecessors, who defended the discriminatory laws at issue in Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Sophia Dodd for the Atlanta History Center on Reproductive Rights in Georgia: Doe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
"  The case in question is Peabody v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:08 am
04/12/09 Sexual Orientation and the Law Blog:"After a week in which the number of states authorizing same-sex marriage doubled," Mayer Brown attorney Steve Sanders, writes, "the New York Times explains why the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:22 am by Karwan Eskerie
Delivering the main judgment of the Court with which King J agreed, Elias LJ recalled the findings of Lord Browne’s 2010 review into University funding which formed the basis of the new scheme, and noted the various provisions in the scheme which were designed to widen access, including loans, grants and scholarships. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:40 am by Nathan Koppel
Half the litigators and legal academics in America are parsing the High Court’s ruling in Wal-Mart v. [read post]