Search for: "Doe v. Chao" Results 61 - 80 of 638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 12:32 pm by William McGeveran
On the other hand, combined with the Court’s earlier decision limiting the availability of Privacy Act damages awards in Doe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Chris Castle
Here is what the 2001 revision to ASCAP’s consent decree says: “ASCAP shall not restrict the right of any member to withdraw from membership in ASCAP…provided that any writer or publisher member who resigns from ASCAP and whose works continue to be licensed by ASCAP by reason of continued membership of a co-writer, writer or publisher of any such works, may elect to continue receiving distribution for such works on the same basis and with the same elections as a member would have,… [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 5:57 pm by Jon Gelman
The insurance company presented the testimony of the vice president of a bill review company.Since NJ does not have a medical fee schedule the court relied upon N.J.S.A. 34:15-15. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:16 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In this case, Aspex sent Clariti a letter that does not create the clear duty required by Aukerman.(...)This court mistakenly relies on Scholle Corp. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:24 am by Allan Erbsen
The Supreme Court's recent plurality opinion in McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:00 am by Guest Author
One year ago tomorrow, in West Virginia v. [read post]
He stated that the judgments in Johnson and Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc; Cornwall County Court v McCabe [2004] UKHL 35  both recognised that provisions in the ERA did not supersede an employee’s common law and contractual rights and he allowed the appeal. [read post]