Search for: "Doe v. City and County of San Francisco (1982)" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
In several major cities and counties, in some territories, perhaps in the whole state of California, and to a small extent in Minnesota, private businesses may not discriminate against patrons based on certain of their political activities. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm by Kelly Hensley and Brian Fong
Municipalities, such as San Francisco, New York City, and Philadelphia, have also enacted bans on inquiries into an applicant’s salary history. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:56 am by SHG
The erroneous grant of summary judgment in qualified-immunity cases imposes no less harm on “‘society as a whole,’” City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 11:06 am by Will Baude
The erroneous grant of summary judgment in qualified-immunity cases imposes no less harm on “‘society as a whole,’” City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 209. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
Claudia told Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle that the bank was nice enough to contact her attorney the day before the sale to offer her the chance to save her home by agreeing to a higher monthly payment. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
The argument against Proposition 8 concluded with a brief presentation by a lawyer for the city and county of San Francisco, Therese M. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 pm by Craig Robins
  Their 2000 Brut Seduction received top prize in its category at the world-class 2009 San Francisco Chronicle Wine Compe [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:04 am
City and County of San Francisco, 539 F.3d 1193 (9th Cir. 2008); Roberts v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Civil Service Comm'n of the City and County of San Francisco, 688 F.2d 615 (9th Cir. 1982), we specifically stated that, "it must not be overlooked that voluntary conciliation and settlement are the preferred means of dispute resolution. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Campbell, 500 P.2d 21, 33-34 (Kan. 1972) ("there is no privilege. . . in an action in which the condition of the patient is an element or factor of the claim or defense of the patient"); City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Campbell, 500 P.2d 21, 33-34 (Kan. 1972); City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]