Search for: "Doe v. Columbia University" Results 241 - 260 of 1,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2023, 5:13 am by INFORRM
Organised jointly by Columbia Global Freedom of Expression, University of Liverpool, University of Sheffield and Worlds of Journalism Study. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
It does this by protecting newspapers from paying claimants’ costs in claims brought against them, where the claimant could instead have used low-cost arbitration. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 6:35 am by Marc DeGirolami
I have found that a good meme can do as much to make, say, Marbury v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:33 am by Peter J. Sluka
 Those changes met Court approval in Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v Chevron Corp., 73 A3d 934 [Del Ch 2013], and ATP Tour, Inc. v Deutscher Tennis Bund, 91 A3d 554 [Del 2014]. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Good morning and thank you, [Columbia Law School] Dean [Gillian] Lester, for the introduction. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 6:07 pm by INFORRM
John, Professor of History and Communications (Columbia University); Michael Schudson, Professor of Journalism and (affiliated faculty) Sociology (Columbia University); and Hawley Johnson, Associate Director, Columbia Global Freedom of Expression. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
., dashed Oreskes’ hopes of testifying as an historian, and told her not to bother coming to Washington for trial.[5] Naomi Oreskes is a “professor of the History of Science, in Harvard University. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
District of Columbia, 670 F.3d 1244 (D.C. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 3:44 am by INFORRM
John, Professor of History and Communications (Columbia University); Michael Schudson, Professor of Journalism and (affiliated faculty) Sociology (Columbia University); and Hawley Johnson, Associate Director, Columbia Global Freedom of Expression. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Duke University School of Law professor Nita Farahany has explained to The Wall Street Journal how employers are increasingly using neurotechnology to monitor employees, and how privacy law has failed to keep up. [read post]
Recognized analogous grounds under section 15(1) include sexual orientation (Egan v Canada), citizenship status (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia), and marital status (Miron v Trudel). [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Author
Finally, the doctrine of standing appears in the public debt context as it does in appropriations, with federal courts holding (Flast v. [read post]