Search for: "Doe v. Delaware" Results 61 - 80 of 2,730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am by John Elwood
Washington test does not adequately protect Sixth Amendment rights. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:37 am by Steven Cardoza
However, the Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District recently expanded upon Grafton in Handoush v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:17 am
Designing Proposals with your Unique Investors In Mind Posted by Amy Freedman, Michael Fein, and Ian Robertson, Kingsdale Advisor, on Friday, November 8, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Boards of Directors, Diversity, ESG, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Shareholder voting A Guidebook to Boardroom Governance Issues Posted by Amy Simmerman and Katherine Henderson, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, on Friday, November 8, 2019 … [read post]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:42 am by John Jascob
The letter referred to a recent Delaware Supreme Court case in which the court said that shareholder ratification of an equity incentive plan does not foreclose review for breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 2:41 am by Peter Mahler
Vice Chancellor Glasscock’s ruling last week in Carr v Global Payments Inc. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:20 am by Joel Goldstein
Having decided two maritime-law cases during its October 2018 term, the Supreme Court will consider its third admiralty case in just over a year when it hears argument in CITGO Asphalt Refining Company v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am by Ben
Amazon.com, Inc in 2007 are themselves not without critics who disagreed with the appellate court ruling that embedding does not require that an image be copied or stored, and thus, does not run afoul of copyright law. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In Schlossberg v Schwartz, 43 Misc 3d 1224(A) [Sup Ct Nassau County 2014], Justice DeStefano explained: The Delaware case law . . . indicates that a broad interpretation of that phrase, which would include a wide array of claims that might be asserted against a director or officer, is warranted. [read post]