Search for: "Doe v. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 4:31 am
All Correction Law §753 factors must be considered before disqualifying an applicant because of his or her conviction of a crimeMatter of Acosta v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2011 NY Slip Op 02073, Court of AppealsIn this decision the Court of Appeals explains that where a prospective employer rejects an applicant for employment because of that individual’s conviction of a crime, Correction Law §753 requires that the employer must determine that… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:34 am
New York City Dept. of Educ., Judge Peter H. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:15 pm
Ohio Dept. of Rehabilitation and Correction, the plaintiff was employed by ODRC as a Senior Parole Officer. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:35 am
Guidelines applicable in selecting or rejecting applicants for employment having a criminal recordMatter of Boatman v New York State Dept. of Educ., 2010 NY Slip Op 03523, decided on April 29, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentCorrection Law §752 bars the denial of a license or employment application based solely upon an applicant's criminal record unless there is "a direct relationship between one or more of the previous criminal offenses and the specific… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
" DOE also contended that it did not receive a copy of the Certificate until after its decision had been rendered.Judge Schlesinger said that Article 23-A of the Correction Law bars discrimination against persons previously convicted of criminal offenses*** and provides that employment cannot be denied based on an applicant's criminal history unless one or both of the following exceptions is found to apply:1. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 10:45 am
Dept. of Justice, Nat. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 8:29 am
One of those was State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:26 am
., People v Chiles, 70 AD3d 1453 [4th Dept 2010]). [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
Such decision-making does not comport with the Correction Law, and runs [athwart] the presumption of rehabilitation afforded by Correction Law § 753(2) (see, e.g., Matter of Dellaporte v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
He does not speak English. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
LEXIS 450 (3d Dept. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
Cases 565, and Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In 1976, the legislature enacted Correction Law article 23-A and Executive Law § 296 (15) in furtherance of 'the 'general purposes' of the Penal Law,' including ''the rehabilitation of those convicted' and 'the promotion of their successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society' (Matter of Acosta v New York City Dept. of Educ., 16 NY3d 309, 314 [2011], quoting Penal Law § 1.05 [6]; see Matter… [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In 1976, the legislature enacted Correction Law article 23-A and Executive Law § 296 (15) in furtherance of 'the 'general purposes' of the Penal Law,' including ''the rehabilitation of those convicted' and 'the promotion of their successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society' (Matter of Acosta v New York City Dept. of Educ., 16 NY3d 309, 314 [2011], quoting Penal Law § 1.05 [6]; see Matter… [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
State of FL Dept of E/P, No. 08-11213 (11th Cir. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Dept. of Indiana Dept. of Child Services (NFP) - Termination, affirmed. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 6:25 am
Ohio Dept. of Veterans Servs, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-3308. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
Indiana Dept. of Corrections, an 8-page opinion, Judge Robb writes:Roy Smith, pro se, appeals from the trial court's order dismissing his complaint against the Indiana Department of Correction ("DOC"), the Indiana State Prison ("ISP"), the State of Indiana, and several employees of ISP, after conducting the inquiry required by Indiana Code chapter 34-58-1. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Stapleton v La Paglia, 207 AD2d 945]Terminating a corrections officer who used excessive force against a prisoner while going to the aid of a fellow officer who has struggling with the inmate. [read post]
